Hulk Hogan Trial Bruther

[Chob]

Interesting.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by The Butler Based on a couple things I saw on the twittalator, a ruling is expected later today.

In this case or the Midget case?

[The Butler]

Originally Posted by milkman In this case or the Midget case?

I assumed the marks were talking about the Hogan case.

[Cpt. Mcgillicutty]

Originally Posted by Chob Interesting.

Indeed

[Cpt. Mcgillicutty]

Originally Posted by milkman In this case or the Midget case?

Doesn't the MJ case start in April or May?

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Cpt. Mcgillicutty Doesn't the MJ case start in April or May?

Well he got that subpoena last week saying he had to be in court today for it. As much as you hinge on every word, figured you would have heard that!

[FatOldMan]

Sounds like he is going to be in court tomorrow for Hootie's trial.

[Cpt. Mcgillicutty]

Originally Posted by milkman Well he got that subpoena last week saying he had to be in court today for it. As much as you hinge on every word, figured you would have heard that!

Well, I'd like to get "philosophical" here for a second and say that Bubba is wrapped up in so many legal issues it's hard to keep them all in order, I apologize sir. It appears as though you are an even bigger mark than I

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Cpt. Mcgillicutty Well, I'd like to get "philosophical" here for a second and say that Bubba is wrapped up in so many legal issues it's hard to keep them all in order, I apologize sir. It appears as though you are a even bigger mark than I

Nice try... as you say "I just pay attention"

Well sometimes.

[The Butler]

Anna Phillips Verified account
‏@annamphillips

Judge rules: Bubba will not have to answer questions in front of a jury.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by The Butler Anna Phillips Verified account ‏@annamphillips Judge rules: Bubba will not have to answer questions in front of a jury.

Yeah I don't see why it would be relevant for this case. He really has nothing to do with Gawkers actions, which is what this is about.

[Cpt. Mcgillicutty]

Originally Posted by milkman Yeah I don't see why it would be relevant for this case. He really has nothing to do with Gawkers actions, which is what this is about.

I think it would be pertinent to know whether Hootie knew he was being filmed and if Bubba could verify it, I think that's a big deal.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Cpt. Mcgillicutty I think it would be pertinent to know whether Hootie knew he was being filmed and if Bubba could verify it, I think that's a big deal.

Has nothing to do with Gawkers right to publish it. If he knew it was being taped so Bubba could jack off, that doesn't give them permission to post it without permission.

[Chob]

Oh hey, there's activity in here.

Does anyone else feel themselves getting nauseous when theses glorified gossip rag columnists get on their high horse about being "journalists?"

[FatOldMan]

@annamphillips
Gawker attorney: "Mr. Clem is a pathological…[stops himself] ...untrustworthy person."