Bubba the Love Sponge Listening & Week 2 Trial Discussion Thread January 22-25, 2013

[milkman]

SJ

[SJ]

mj is flapped up cause if he words things the wrong way he knows it's gonna get picked apart on cross

[ch3cooh]

the brent concerts during the breaks were hilarious

[SJ]

Originally Posted by Cpt. Mcgillicutty Why the fuck is that idiot wearing a scuba diving watch up there?

coughsomeonesenthimonetoocough

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Cpt. Mcgillicutty Why the fuck is that idiot wearing a scuba diving watch up there?

I'll Suuueeee you CPt..it might rain I need to tell time when I am under water from torrential downpours.

[ch3cooh]

Originally Posted by SJ mj is flapped up cause if he words things the wrong way he knows it's gonna get picked apart on cross

once again, MJ doesn't know how to work

[ch3cooh]

Does he have a receipt showing he paid and that he didn't get a deal for plugs?

[Cpt. Mcgillicutty]

Originally Posted by milkman I'll Suuueeee you CPt..it might rain I need to tell time when I am under water from torrential downpours.

[milkman]

Oh no's..he got "bashed over the head" with an email?

[iobane]

Harvey milkman, attorney at law.

[Chob]

Originally Posted by milkman Oh no's..he got "bashed over the head" with an email?

"I was in danger of being buried underground!"

[Dan Blaze]

This case is why all the recent bullshit about "bullying" bugs me so much.

We'd never get out of court if we started suing each other for the shit we say on here

[Dan Blaze]

Originally Posted by Chob "I was in danger of being buried underground!"

To be fair, it would only have to be a 4 foot hole.

[Cpt. Mcgillicutty]

Originally Posted by milkman Oh no's..he got "bashed over the head" with an email?

Insert Hannah Barbara "kabong" sound effect here

[SJ]

Originally Posted by ch3cooh Does he have a receipt showing he paid and that he didn't get a deal for plugs?

unfortunately I don't think he has to prove it..

the case is against bubba..

bubba made the allegations and mj is rebutting them by saying it was slander cause these advertisers had deals with CC...

however the whole thing IMO is moot cause it's an FCC violation and should be adressed by them... not a jury.. so that whole thing again solely IMO should be ignored and I probably wouldn't think about it if I was a juror but I'm crazy and don't think right